Porn Films Case: Bombay HC Rejects Actor Gehana Vasisht's Pre-Arrest Bail Plea

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday rejected the pre-arrest bail plea filed by actor Gehana Vasisht accused in a case related to pornographic films. She has been booke💦d under Sections 354-C (outraging modesty of woman), 292 and 293 (sale of obscene material) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Sections 66E, 67, 67A (transmission of sexually explicit material) of the Information Technology Act, and provisions of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act.

Vasisht is accused of threatening📖, coercing and♛ luring women with money to act in pornographic films.

Justice S K Shinde refuse𓆉d to grant anticipatory bail to the actor on Tuesday.

Vasisht fi🐠led the plea last month, apprehending arrest in the case.

The city police had registered three FIRs in the porn filmꦗ🗹s racket case against several persons.

Businessman Raj Kundra, the husband of Bollywood actor Shilpa Shettyཧꦿ, is an accused in one of the FIRs.

He was♛ arres♕ted on July 19 this year and is currently in judicial custody.

The police's case against Vasisht is that she had lured women with the promise of small acting jobs and forced them to act in obscene movies. These movies were thenꦏ uploaded on the mobile app Hotshots, allegedly owned by Kundra.

The police subsequently also filed an application before a lower court to add anot🌳her charge against Vasisht under section 3🌺70 (detaining a person against their will) of the IPC.

Vasisht's♉ advocate Abhishek Yende had earlier argued that the actor's arrest was not required as the police have already recovered evidence from her.

With PTI inputs