Fashion is break-free. Even the Oxforą¼ŗd Dictionary adheres to it, fashion fšollows the word fascism.
Fashion can start with lettinš g go ofš everything it is usually related to.
Fashion is break-free. Even the Oxforą¼ŗd Dictionary adheres to it, fashion fšollows the word fascism.
Much ošf āfashion as a trendā has been talked about.
A way of doing thiš«ngs? Again, it is what fashion has always beenš thought of.
It is supposed to be moreš than the things it has ever been associated with. Maybe we need to erase the word fashion itself. Fashion can start with letting go of everything it is usually related to.
Let's rather call it āZYXā for the time being.
ZYX may not be something material, but it can sustaā¤in an imš¹pression in our minds.
In fact, hāypothesis iź§s the first step towards a new reality. Everything we can think of will be possible someday.
Or maybe ZYX can be a way out for those who want to live their fantasies. ZYX may be a reš§øality to someoneās hypothesis.
ZYX should be a new medium away from garments, dreams, music, paper, mannequinsš·, colours, love, people, photographs, videos, oil, water, sculptures, etc.
ZYX is looking for India and discovering America.
ZYX hasšÆ to offend itself rather than doing it tšo others.
ZYX is newness in every possible way.
It has to be the unapparent.
The unanticipated.
ZYX has to be a two-way process, a give aź¦nd take rather than a one-way accušmulation.
And this is a lie Iā am telling since these words and this language exist for ZYX to be talked about. How no truth is told 100%.
ZYX could be an aid to other ignorant things in this world like techš±nology, politics, medicine, law and for all those who say fashion is a business out of entertainment and look at it as something inferior.
ZYX should be oneās selfishness that doesnāt aš²ffect others. ZYX has š to be a way out of all the miseries.
ZYX has to un-entertain šilliteracy, unawareness, poverty, terrorism, etc.
ZYX has to be an international isļ·½sue and should exist just as a superhero does, and people be curious about them.
ZYXš has to lure the world, the terrorists, the non-fashionistas, the doctors, the engineers, the taxi driver, the electrician, š”the construction worker, the good and the bad.
ź¦ Something like terrorišsts giving up on terrorism and wishing to dress up or design, for that matter.
But before all, ZYX has to aid itself. The practical approach would say that something like fast ZYX has to undo itself. āA Zara T-shirt worth $40 is thought to be very nominal for a person buying it; it might cost $15 to the producer, but a 12-year-old is missing out on all the enlightenment and fun (thatās what we want in life, right?) while he makes that T-shirt. In that case, we are buying it very cheap.
All the ZYX designers and students should pledge to give away whatever money they earn to educate people. Eāducate ZYX, maybe.
Luxury has been exploited, we donāt need it anymore. No luxury products. A lot of funds are being dumped. Arenāt all the good things for ā±free? All the luxury products have to be disowned. They should just not exist. Letās see what happens.
Letās celebrate a day when everyoneą² destroys their luxury items, makes a video, and puts it on the Internet.
ZYX has to overtake a lot of aspects.
ZYX should make everyone live the life šof a Richie-rich, a wanna-be and later hate it. Be less pretentious?
ZYX has to undo and unquote whateverš has been quoted about itself.
āFashion is a form of ugliness so intāšØolerable that we have to alter it every six months,ā said Oscar Wilde; how do you revamp this quote?
I remember rā¦eturning from my school, seeing the road to home as a ramp and walking it down, looking at the tiniest details on the way. The guy serving tea on the way was such a model. All š that while I was studying sciences. So ZYX need not happen to a ZYXāista or a designer.
ZYX has to be a saviour.
It may not mean anything.
ZYX is aboutąµ² being less pessimistic and more optiāØmistic.
No business involved.
No incoherence produced by unoriginal ideas.
ZYX redefinition isnāt supposed to be looked for but should simply happen to oneās mind, shaāź¦red, agreed to and worked on.
Coco Chanel didnāt say things so that later people could quote it. She didnāt design things to make all the difference. She wanted things a certašøin way that was away from what society could accept.
ZYX isnāt about this writing competition; itās a process that shall keep goš°ing.
One has to be free, so will be ZYX.